W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-privacy@w3.org > July to September 2010

RE: Draft: Privacy Workshop Report

From: Sören Preibusch <Soeren.Preibusch@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:14:06 +0100
To: "'Robin Berjon'" <robin@berjon.com>, "'Thomas Roessler'" <tlr@w3.org>
Cc: <public-privacy@w3.org>
Message-ID: <006001cb3a17$dc6841b0$9538c510$@Preibusch@cl.cam.ac.uk>
We seemed to have some consensus that, for instance, the use of operating
system-wide symbols to indicate that geo-location is active is preferable to
having each application (browser, ...) use their own iconography.

I would agree there is a chance for icons failing for the same reasons that
P3P failed and I think there were more people nodding their heads re this


-----Original Message-----

• I'm not sure what "and that, privacy controls should be kept as close to
the mobile device as possible" intends to capture.

• Deirdre's remark that the icons would fail for the same reason as P3P did
was, I thought, somewhat tempered in the discussion that followed the
Received on Thursday, 12 August 2010 12:14:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:23:51 UTC