Modular XSL-FO 2.0 spec?

This is an idea that Liam has talked about at various times, but would it
be useful *not* put things like copy-fitting into the ppl's version of the
XSL-FO 2.0 WD and to instead make (as much as possible) standalone modules
for new additions such as copy-fitting?  The ppl's XSL-FO spec would then
be largely XSL 1.1 (+ errata) and the changes necessary to describe how
other modules would slot into the larger whole.

It seems to me that doing things in smaller chunks would better fit our
resources.

Regards,


Tony.

Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 13:56:26 UTC