W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ppl@w3.org > February 2013

Re: my approach on paged media

From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:10:30 +0000
Message-ID: <CAEncD4dKK8enA9bXv9ZsjGMdg4NYk4h4X7aOaeS2NHBfvG0Jag@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-ppl@w3.org" <public-ppl@w3.org>
On 10 February 2013 11:59, Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net> wrote:
> On Sun, February 10, 2013 11:26 am, Patrick Gundlach wrote:
>> I'll write something up and put it into the wiki.
>>
>> 1) What kind of problems do we deal in day to day work?
>> 2) My layout language "specification"
>>
>> So we can discuss it and compare it to the requirements of XSL-FO 2.0
> and/or CSS 3
>
> Thanks, that would be good food for thought.
>
>> Hope to be finished end of next week.
>
> But now that we're awake, we don't need to go back to sleep until Patrick
> has put something up.  Are we here to shore-up XSL 1.1 (as seemed to me to
> be a concern when we started), to define common APIs, to advance XSL 2.0
> in the absence of anywhere else doing it, to try to build bridges with CSS
> paged media work, or what?

A concern is that, since few/no W3C members are interested, what to do
with requirements/ideas for further developments?

One option would be a post (long term?) from this group.

What other options are there?

regards




-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Sunday, 10 February 2013 12:10:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 10 February 2013 12:10:57 GMT