W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ppl@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Workflow - on the wiki

From: Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 23:55:58 -0300
Message-id: <4F654EBE.6040202@eastlink.ca>
To: public-ppl@w3.org
I should elaborate and clarify: by "products" I mean the materials they
have provided for validation.

And by "deficiencies" I don't mean defects.


On 12-03-17 11:38 PM, Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> Hi, Jirka
> With reference to the link you provided for the RenderX validators, yes,
> this is what I was looking at too. They'd already had some semblance of
> at least one of these way back when.
> What Dave mentioned about grammar-based validation jibes with my
> impressions from many years ago; honestly I'd have to revisit the
> problem myself before committing an opinion. :-) Having said that, it
> strikes me that if you've got folks in Prague at XSL 2012 saying that
> XSL validation is a problem, surely a number of them must have tried the
> RenderX and AH products, so what are the outstanding deficiencies with
> those?
> Arved
Received on Sunday, 18 March 2012 02:56:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:57:24 UTC