W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ppl@w3.org > April 2012

Re: Another viewpoint on validation

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:01:31 +0100
Message-ID: <4F89914B.30004@nag.co.uk>
To: public-ppl@w3.org
On 13/04/2012 22:44, Tony Graham wrote:
> Personally, I don't see that the W3C is set up for CGs to write a spec in
> the absence of a WG to take it over and bless it.  For starters, CGs don't
> come with CVS or Mercurial access on the W3C servers so it would be harder
> for a CG to do things that fit into the regular spec-production processes.

Is that necessarily true? xml-er is similarly a CG and it has

http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xml-er/raw-file/tip/Overview.html

admittedly Anne works for a member company and is a member of several WG 
in addition to the CG but the draft is under the control of a CG.

David
Received on Saturday, 14 April 2012 15:01:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 14 April 2012 15:01:55 GMT