- From: Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 23:51:11 +0100 (IST)
- To: "public-ppl@w3.org" <public-ppl@w3.org>
On Wed, April 4, 2012 5:00 pm, Jean Kaplansky wrote: > +1 on this idea. It's your wiki, too. Any member can edit the pages. > On Apr 3, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Jeremias Maerki <dev@jeremias-maerki.ch> > wrote: > >> I'm wondering if it would make sense to split up the listing of the >> XSL-FO processors in: >> - actual XSL-FO processors (Examples: FOP, AntennaHouse, etc.) >> - stand-alone XSL-FO editors (which usually bundle one or more XSL-FO >> processors) (Examples: Ecrion Designer, XSLfast etc.) >> - and integrated (output management) solutions in which XSL-FO >> processors are used and which might or might not contain an XSL-FO based >> editor. (Examples: Assentis DocBase, Ecrion Rendering Server, >> Thunderhead etc.) >> >> I think that would also make it easier to build tables that compare the I've turned the original list into a table that can be sorted on each column and added a column for 'Type'. The 'Type' data is incomplete. We could also add columns for platform (Windows, Linux, etc.) and maybe another table for programming interface (Java, .NET, etc.). >> capabilities of various products. It would also be useful to compile a >> list products in the HTML/CSS corner which are targeted at print output. +1, though I don't have much information on that myself. >> On 28.03.2012 11:24:44 Tony Graham wrote: >>> I've added pages for listing XSL-FO processors: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/community/ppl/wiki/XSL-FO_Processors Regards, Tony.
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2012 22:51:45 UTC