W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-powderwg@w3.org > September 2008

Re: Multiple display text/icons (treat as LC comment)

From: David Rooks <drooks@segala.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 19:51:41 +0100
Message-ID: <57e42cb10809021151g3d99764cu4029d06199f551a7@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-powderwg@w3.org
Cc: parcher@fosi.org, "Smith, Kevin, VF-Group" <kevin.smith@vodafone.com>
Hmm, take the example below. I think it is pretty clear what I am trying to
do and i think this should be valid.

<descriptorset>
   <ex:wcag>AA</ex:wcag>
   <ex:mok>true</ex:mok>

   <displaytext>Everything on example.com is wcag aa and mok
compliant</displaytext>
   <displayicon src="http://authority.example.org/wcag.png" />
   <displayicon src="http://authority.example.org/mok.png" />
</descriptorset>

Following on from this example - it seems reasonable to me that if more than
1 icon is acceptable then more than 1 displaytext is also acceptable. i.e.
you should be able to have a displaytext for each icon you want to display.
However, i can only see this working if we can associate displaytext with
displayicons. This would be particularly useful in a powder application as
it would allow the app to display a list of icons with some text beside
each.

e.g.
MOK.png - everything on example.com is MOK compliant
WCAG.png - everything on example.com is WCAG AA compliant
ICRA.png - everything on example.com has nakedness

Dave.

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Smith, Kevin, (R&D) VF-Group <
Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com> wrote:

> I will aslo fix the schema so that validation will pick this up.
> --kev
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: public-powderwg-request@w3.org <public-powderwg-request@w3.org>
> To: Public POWDER <public-powderwg@w3.org>
> Sent: Tue Sep 02 11:48:19 2008
> Subject: Multiple display text/icons (treat as LC comment)
>
>
> Ivan H has been amending his Creative Commons/SW logo copyright example
> to fit in with the LC drafts and I'm just looking at it now.
>
> In one of his descriptor sets, Ivan has included two displaytext
> elements. This is, I'm sure, an oversight, but looking at the doc [1] we
> don't say that this is invalid - and the validator I'm working on
> doesn't spot this. So we have two options I'd say:
>
> 1. Amend the text to make multiple display text (and displayicon)
> elements invalid
>
> 2. Add a line to say that how a UA handles multiple display elements is
> application-specific (it might display both or the first one, or the
> last one or whatever)
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-powder-dr-20080815/#operational
>
> Phil.
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:52:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:42:13 GMT