Following on from Monday's discussion about the correct attribute for the Tagset (sorry, tagset :-)) We ended up saying that we would define wdr:ref to mean that the referenced resource may provide further definition of what the tag(s) mean. I wonder whether we should use the (well established) rdfs:seeAlso predicate for this? So we'd have something like <tagset rdfs:seeAlso="http://example.com/chilli_sauce.htm"> <tag>Salsa</tag> <tag>tomato</tag> </tagset> The definition [1] of rdfs:seeAlso says: "A triple of the form: S rdfs:seeAlso O states that the resource O may provide additional information about S. It may be possible to retrieve representations of O from the Web, but this is not required. When such representations may be retrieved, no constraints are placed on the format of those representations." WDYT? Phil. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_seealsoReceived on Wednesday, 5 March 2008 11:59:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 October 2008 00:56:56 GMT