W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-powderwg@w3.org > July 2008

Editorial Comment on Formal Semantics: RDF Class vs OWL Class

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:23:57 +0200
Message-ID: <487B617D.70201@w3.org>
To: public-powderwg@w3.org
Comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-powder-formal-20080709/, Formal 

Editorial comment, right before example 3-12:

"RDF Class, (i.e. an OWL instance, not an OWL Class)". An RDF Class 
(actually, RDFS class) can also be an OWL Class in OWL Full semantics, 
ie, this statement may not be correct. I suggest replacing the whole 
sentence by 'RDF Resource'



Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Monday, 14 July 2008 14:32:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:06:04 UTC