Re: Comment on POWDER WDR, 2008-06-30: usage of value in hasValue

Oops:-) Sorry, I made the wrong bindings.

Editorial comment then: try to avoid using the same property names once 
with a URIRef and once with a literal...

Ivan

Phil Archer wrote:
> 
> 
> Ivan Herman wrote:
>> Comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-powder-dr-20080630/
>>
>> In examples 2.2 and 2.3, for the generated POWDER-S:
>>
>> <descriptorset>
>>        <ex:shape rdf:resource="http://example.org/vocab#square" />
>> </descriptorset>
>>
>> is translated into:
>>
>> <owl:Restriction>
>>   <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="http://example.org/vocab#shape" />
>>   <owl:hasValue>square</owl:hasValue>
>> </owl:Restriction>
>>
>> however, it should be
>>
>> <owl:Restriction>
>>   <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="http://example.org/vocab#shape" />
>>   <owl:hasValue rdf:resource"http://example.org/vocab#square" />
>> </owl:Restriction>
> 
> On this occasion I'm going to disagree - example 2.3 is the POWDER-S 
> version of 2-1 where the descriptor set includes
> 
> <ex:color>red</ex:color>
> <ex:shape>square</ex:shape>
> 
> We don't show the POWDER-S version of example 2-2 but if we did, then 
> yes, it would be as you say.
> 
> Phil.

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf