W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-powderwg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: operationally, ResourceSets are sets of URIs not resources

From: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:51:51 +0000
Message-ID: <478606D7.8080506@icra.org>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
CC: public-powderwg@w3.org

It may be opportune to point out that on Monday's call we resolved:

"The WG is happy to forego grouping by resource property if that means 
that POWDER avoids a lot of complexity for little obvious gain." :-)


Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> Phil Archer wrote:
> 
>> Personally, I am a little reluctant to let go completely of resource 
>> set definitions based on resource properties (cf. URI component 
>> properties) as it is not hard to conceive of real-world situations 
>> where this is of potential usage. For example, an English teacher 
>> might publish an opinion that if the language used in a particular 
>> reference document is en-us then both the spelling and usage of nouns 
>> as verbs is not to be repeated when answering exam questions; if the 
>> number of images in a document exceeds x then the page in unlikely to 
>> be suitable for display on mobile etc. These apply whatever the URI(s) 
>> of the resource may be.
>>
> 
> At this stage, let's agree to differ on that one.
> 
> I will move on to making more concrete proposals, and we will need to 
> revisit this disagreement.
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> 

-- 
Phil Archer
Chief Technical Officer,
Family Online Safety Institute
w. http://www.fosi.org/people/philarcher/
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2008 11:52:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:42:12 GMT