Error (IMHO) in the formal doc

Stasinos,

Working through the discussion with Tim about the conformance criteria 
for the formal doc has made me re-read section 5 where you've written:

"In addition, the POWDER processor may return a triple with a u as 
subject, wdrs:describedby as property, and the IRI of the POWDER 
processor as object."

That should read:

"In addition, the POWDER processor may return a triple with a u as 
subject, wdrs:describedby as property, and the IRI of the *POWDER 
document* from which the description was obtained as object. If more 
than one POWDER document is the source of the description then each 
should be the object of a similar triple."

Is that going to make you go into a huff of logic?

P

-- 

Phil Archer
w. http://philarcher.org/