W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-powderwg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: The 'missing protocol part'?

From: Stasinos Konstantopoulos <konstant@iit.demokritos.gr>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:02:13 +0300
To: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
Cc: Public POWDER <public-powderwg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20080424100213.GB28938@iit.demokritos.gr>

On Wed Apr 23 09:26:24 2008 Phil Archer said:

> How would OWL processors handle a request such this? returning the  
> property restrictions for all sub classes of classes that match the  
> query parameters?

One could use, say RDQL or SPARQL, to retrieve the set of resources that
have the requested properties. Or one could use a reasoner like Pellet
to find out whether being blue is compatible (consistent) with being
under example.org, regardless of whether there actually is a blue
resource under example.org right now.

s
Received on Thursday, 24 April 2008 10:02:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:42:12 GMT