W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-powderwg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: The 'missing protocol part'?

From: Stasinos Konstantopoulos <konstant@iit.demokritos.gr>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:59:13 +0300
To: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
Cc: Public POWDER <public-powderwg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20080423075913.GE5492@iit.demokritos.gr>

On Wed Apr 23 06:50:58 2008 Phil Archer said:

> A first pass at this leads me to suggest that for a URI, u, the basic 
> function is
> 
> describe(u)
> 
> which would return RDF triples like
> 
> <rdf:Description rdf:about="u">
>   <ex:color>red</ex:color>
>   <ex:shape>square</ex:shape>
> </rdf:Description>
> 
> (or the same thing in other serialisations)

Isn't POWDER also about resource discovery? A function

 described( d, h )

with the same POWDER doc and/or creator parameters as describe(),
returning a set of resources that (a) are described by d and (b) are
subsumed by host or hosts h.

s
 
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2008 07:59:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:42:12 GMT