public-powderwg@w3.org from October 2007 by author

Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)

• Review of POWDER draft (Thursday, 4 October)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: Review of POWDER draft (Monday, 8 October)

Dan Connolly

• Re: assuming HTTP Link will get ratified? (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: assuming HTTP Link will get ratified? (Monday, 15 October)
• assuming HTTP Link will get ratified? (Friday, 5 October)

Jonathan Rees

• where is the rdf (owl, etc.) file for the powder vocabulary? (Tuesday, 16 October)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: assuming HTTP Link will get ratified? (Monday, 15 October)

Phil Archer

• POWDER and FOAF (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: Link Header draft (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: where is the rdf (owl, etc.) file for the powder vocabulary? (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Seeking help with a Description Resources issue (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: assuming HTTP Link will get ratified? (Friday, 12 October)
• POWDER WG timeline (hoped for) (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Comments from SWCG (Friday, 5 October)

Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich

• RE: POWDER WG timeline (hoped for) (Wednesday, 10 October)

Last message date: Friday, 19 October 2007 10:03:24 UTC