W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-powderwg@w3.org > October 2007

Re: assuming HTTP Link will get ratified?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:58:59 -0500
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>, public-powderwg@w3.org, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1192489139.25511.21.camel@pav>

On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 08:40 +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> The best way to get this moving is to get discussion going on the  
> list; as a consensus emerges, other people will either have to offer  
> up objections / alternatives, or get out of the way. What's stopping  
> it now is inertia...

Hmm... I thought Phil did a pretty good job of documenting
a fair amount of consensus in the form of deployed software.
I don't see what's to discuss.

Haven't we already reached the point where the burden
is on those who want something different?

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 15 October 2007 22:58:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:42:11 GMT