W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-powderwg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: [SKOS] ACTION on relating skos:Concept to a foaf:Person

From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetilk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:05:07 +0200
To: public-swd-wg@w3.org
Cc: Public POWDER <public-powderwg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200706211505.08548.kjetilk@opera.com>

On Thursday 21 June 2007 14:35, aisaac@few.vu.nl wrote:
> PS: by the way if you are urgently interested in the POWDER thing
> it's perhaps better if you anser the second part of my previous mail
> ;-)

Heh, ok! :-)

On Wednesday 20 June 2007 23:27, aisaac@few.vu.nl wrote:
> This problem is not trivial to understand: what does this
> http://www.fosi.org/rdf/descriptions#just-nude stand for? Why would
> it be different from the description of a SKOS concept using for
> instance some SKOS notes and SKOS semantic relationships? In this
> case you could just use a SKOS mapping link (well we have to define
> them, so just tell your requirement ;) saying that your
> http://my.opera.com/username/tag/nude is semantically equivalent to
> http://www.fosi.org/rdf/descriptions#just-nude , couldn't you?

Yes, I could, what I want to say in this case is that 
http://my.opera.com/username/tag/nude is semantically equivalent to
http://www.fosi.org/rdf/descriptions#just-nude (or rather 
<http://repository.icra.org/generic#nudity> which is a stable URI for 
exactly this resource, however, its rdf:type is TBD.)

However, the problem is that the UI our users see for the case of saying 
that the http://my.opera.com/username/tag/nude is semantically 
equivalent to http://repository.icra.org/generic#nudity is not 
different from saying that http://my.opera.com/username/tag/kjetil is 
somehow related to the resource me... 

So, that's the problem, I need something generic enough to say both 
these things.  

-- 
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Semantic Web Specialist
Opera Software ASA
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 13:05:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:42:11 GMT