W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-powderwg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: [SKOS] ACTION on relating skos:Concept to a foaf:Person

From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetilk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:03:25 +0200
To: public-swd-wg@w3.org
Cc: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>, Public POWDER <public-powderwg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200706201003.29301.kjetilk@opera.com>

Thank you, Tom!

I'd just like to point out that the most urgent part of this issue is 
not so much FOAF, but POWDER, that I posted in April:

For reference for the POWDER group, here's the status update:
On Tuesday 19 June 2007 20:03, Thomas Baker wrote:
> We had an unscheduled discussion in today's telecon about the
> problem of linking skos:Concepts to classes in an ontology
> [1].  As explained by Kjetil Kjernsmo in January, the question
> is how to link a skos:Concept to, say, a foaf:Person [2].
> Properties called skos:is and skos:as were evidently considered
> at one point (definitions?).
> Alistair confirmed that he sees this requirement surfacing
> in various contexts, and Antoine sees the issue as related
> to the broader issue of OWL/SKOS coexistence [3].
> We agreed to put this on next week's agenda by posting
> these links to the list.  Antoine agreed to do this but the
> action was not recorded, so the unrecorded action can now be
> considered done :-)
> Tom
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/06/19-swd-irc#T15-53-18
> [2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jan/0069.html
> [3]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jun/0077.html

Kjetil Kjernsmo
Semantic Web Specialist
Opera Software ASA
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2007 08:03:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:06:02 UTC