W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-powderwg@w3.org > August 2007

Re: clarity of examples Re: Comments on Grouping of Resources

From: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:52:34 +0100
Message-ID: <46B0AC42.7090805@icra.org>
To: public-powderwg@w3.org

Quick note on this.

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:

> Perhaps we should also note that
>  <wdr:includeHosts>example.org</wdr:includeHosts>
>  <wdr:excludeHosts>.example.org</wdr:excludeHosts>
> Is what you need unless you want to implicitly include anything in a 
> subdomain. Note that there are coordination discussions on this topic 
> with the WAF group, and there is a precedent in P3P, so alignment here 
> is an ongoing pursuit.

The agreement reached with the WAF group on the relevant public lists 
and now being written up by them and us is that you should include a * 
character, so your example, Charles, would be

[] a wdr:ResourceSet;
    wdr:includeHosts "example.org";
    wdr:excludeHosts "*.example.org";

i.e. example.org implies example.org AND ALL its subdomains.

*.example.org just means the subdomains of example.org but not 
example.org itself.

(Actually, we should probably take a formal resolution in the POWDER WG 
to do this but it'll come up when we discuss the next iteration of the 
Resource Grouping doc)

Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2007 15:53:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:06:03 UTC