- From: Raj Singh <rsingh@opengeospatial.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:37:12 -0400
- To: Alex Hill <ahill@gatech.edu>
- Cc: "public-poiwg@w3.org W3C" <public-poiwg@w3.org>
Yes, time is a POITermType (which is an extension of POIBaseType). Why would you expect it to be a POIType? POIType is basically a POI, having a label, description, categories and links. Why would time need to have these things? I've updated two of my examples here: http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/wiki/In_the_US http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/wiki/An_airport And everyone please also post examples, and link to them from the use case page: http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/wiki/Use_Cases --- Raj The OGC: Making location count... http://www.opengeospatial.org/contact On Oct 22, at 10:39 AM, Alex Hill wrote: > Raj, > Thanks, this looks awesome. > I am a little confused about the XML schema; it seems to be saying that "time" is an element introduced by POIBaseType when I would have expected it to come from POIType. > Alex > > On Oct 22, 2011, at 2:51 AM, Raj Singh wrote: > >> I've added an XML schema file and graphic to the data model page: >> http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/wiki/Data_Model >> >> The biggest change from previous versions is that I've ***made all attributes into elements.*** This is because I think that makes it easier to convert between XML, JSON and RDF (having written some XML<->JSON<->PHP arrays<->MongoDB translation code over the past couple days. After some deep soul searching (having used XML schema heavily in grad school), I'm coming around to the idea that XML may not be the most popular way to exchange POI information -- JSON and RDF are just as important -- so having XML that may not look very elegant is less important than enabling easy translation between these popular representation models. >> >> Comments, flames, welcome as always. >> >> Now to re-do all my examples... >> >> ----- >> Raj Singh >> rsingh@opengeospatial.org >> +1 (617) 642-9372 >> The OGC: Making location count... >> http://www.opengeospatial.org/contact >> >> >> >> On Oct 21, at 7:10 PM, Raj Singh wrote: >> >>> On second thought, no need for a POITimeType. The time functionality can be handled by POITermType. >>> --- >>> Raj >>> >>> On Oct 21, at 6:30 PM, Raj Singh wrote: >>> >>>> new version of the core data model (version 5) posted: >>>> http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/wiki/Data_Model >>>> >>>> This doesn't change anything if you've been writing sample POIs. It's all internal changes to make the model more elegant. This is hopefully a "feature freeze" version before the next draft publication. >>>> >>>> The classes have been modularized a little more to allow for a new time type, and the "POIControlledVocabularyType" has been change to "POITermType"to make the name easier to say (the phrase controlled vocabulary is still useful when defining what this is). >>>> >>>> Also, "Abstract" has been taken out of some type names as I found the right way to specify that a class is abstract in UML2 is just to italicize the name. >>>> >>>> And finally, the big addition is a POITimeType, which allows for specially named times to be added to <pois>, <poi> and <location>. The names we have now are "start" and "end". The administrative time types of "updated", "created", and "deleted" are still in the POIBaseType. >>>> >>>> enjoy, >>>> Raj >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Raj Singh >>>> rsingh@opengeospatial.org >>>> +1 (617) 642-9372 >>>> The OGC: Making location count... >>>> http://www.opengeospatial.org/contact >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > Alex Hill Ph.D. > www.alexshill.com >
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 19:37:49 UTC