public-poiwg@w3.org from June 2011 by author

Alex Hill

• Re: ISSUE-26 - representing time? (Friday, 10 June)
• ISSUE-31 relative points? (Friday, 10 June)
• ISSUE-26 - representing time? (Friday, 10 June)
• Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Re: ACTION-33 Map georeference needed? (Wednesday, 1 June)
• ACTION-33 Map georeference needed? (Wednesday, 1 June)

Alexander Mayrhofer

• AW: Re: "geo:" URIs (Tuesday, 28 June)
• AW: "geo:" URIs (Tuesday, 28 June)
• "geo:" URIs (Monday, 27 June)

Andy Mabbett

• Re: AW: Re: "geo:" URIs (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: "geo:" URIs (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: "geo:" URIs (Tuesday, 28 June)

Christine Perey

• Re: ISSUE-31 relative points? (Sunday, 12 June)

Dan Brickley

• Re: demo POI service available (Wednesday, 1 June)

Jens de Smit

• Re: "geo:" URIs (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: "geo:" URIs (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: "geo:" URIs (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: ISSUE-31 relative points? (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (Friday, 10 June)
• Re: demo POI service available (Wednesday, 1 June)

Matt Womer

• Minutes 16 June 2011 POIWG Teleconference (Thursday, 16 June)
• Minutes 2 June, 2011 POIWG Teleconference (Thursday, 2 June)
• Minutes 26 May 2011 POI WG Teleconference (Thursday, 2 June)

Raj Singh

• Re: AW: Re: "geo:" URIs (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: "geo:" URIs (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: ISSUE-31 relative points? (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: ISSUE-31 relative points? (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: ISSUE-26 - representing time? (Monday, 13 June)
• updated POI UML diagram (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: ISSUE-26 - representing time? (Friday, 10 June)
• Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (Friday, 10 June)
• Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (Tuesday, 7 June)
• can we decide on geography representation this week? (Monday, 6 June)
• Re: demo POI service available (Wednesday, 1 June)

Seiler, Karl

• RE: "geo:" URIs (Tuesday, 28 June)
• RE: ISSUE-31 relative points? (Thursday, 16 June)
• RE: ISSUE-31 relative points? (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: ISSUE-31 relative points? (Wednesday, 15 June)
• RE: ISSUE-31 relative points? (Wednesday, 15 June)
• RE: ISSUE-31 relative points? (Wednesday, 15 June)
• RE: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (Wednesday, 15 June)

Thomas Wrobel

• Re: ISSUE-31 relative points? (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: ISSUE-31 relative points? (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: ISSUE-31 relative points? (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (Sunday, 12 June)
• Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (Monday, 6 June)

Last message date: Tuesday, 28 June 2011 18:00:38 UTC