- From: Raj Singh <rsingh@opengeospatial.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:00:22 -0400
- To: roBman@mob-labs.com
- Cc: "discussion@arstandards.org" <discussion@arstandards.org>, "public-poiwg@w3.org" <public-poiwg@w3.org>
Carl has coordinated with the W3C SPARQL folks on a review of this. It's hard to comment on any specific relationship to a domain of interest such as AR. My general opinion on questions like this is that the technology should be loosely coupled enough to support a wide range of innovation by creative developers in all domains. As long as we support RDF in the POI work, things should take care of themselves in the AR arena. --- Raj The OGC: Making location count... http://www.opengeospatial.org/contact On Jul 11, at 10:38 AM, Rob Manson wrote: > Thought I'd post this link to both groups as it seems very relevant in a > lot of ways. Especially back to some early points I made about the > separation between "representation" and "query". > > OGC Seeks Comment on candidate GeoSPARQL standard > http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/requests/80 > Please note: This Request is scheduled to close on 5 August > 2011. > > George, Raj, Carl - what are your thoughts on this in relation to AR? > > > roBman > >
Received on Monday, 11 July 2011 15:00:59 UTC