W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-poiwg@w3.org > July 2011

Re: OGC's proposed GeoSPARQL standard

From: Raj Singh <rsingh@opengeospatial.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:00:22 -0400
Cc: "discussion@arstandards.org" <discussion@arstandards.org>, "public-poiwg@w3.org" <public-poiwg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5A5F4991-19D3-42C1-8585-236112ED4FCA@opengeospatial.org>
To: roBman@mob-labs.com
Carl has coordinated with the W3C SPARQL folks on a review of this. 

It's hard to comment on any specific relationship to a domain of interest such as AR. My general opinion on questions like this is that the technology should be loosely coupled enough to support a wide range of innovation by creative developers in all domains. As long as we support RDF in the POI work, things should take care of themselves in the AR arena.

The OGC: Making location count...

On Jul 11, at 10:38 AM, Rob Manson wrote:

> Thought I'd post this link to both groups as it seems very relevant in a
> lot of ways.  Especially back to some early points I made about the
> separation between "representation" and "query".
>        OGC Seeks Comment on candidate GeoSPARQL standard
>        http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/requests/80
>        Please note: This Request is scheduled to close on 5 August
>        2011.
> George, Raj, Carl - what are your thoughts on this in relation to AR?
> roBman
Received on Monday, 11 July 2011 15:00:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:05:22 UTC