W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-poiwg@w3.org > September 2010

Re: POI WG charter status

From: Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:10:09 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTimeALGzPT12QYdbHB86Yr8g1=hZ0pNKfVO04+S9@mail.gmail.com>
To: roBman@mob-labs.com
Cc: "Braun, Andrew" <Andrew.Braun@sonyericsson.com>, "Public POI @ W3C" <public-poiwg@w3.org>
Wait, its Point of Interest? Not Pattern of Interest?

On 10 September 2010 02:04, Rob Manson <roBman@mob-labs.com> wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> I'm fascinated to see how cut-down the charter now is, especially based
> on the public discussion and apparent consensus that had been forming on
> this list.
>
> Personally I find it hard to see how a solely Point of Interest standard
> based on the thinnest definition will be anything but very out dated and
> redundant by Dec 2011 (scheduled date for REC).
>
> Also, since so many people will be in Seoul for ISMAR10, ISWC, Mobile AR
> Summit and the AR Standards Workshop then surely that would be a great
> time to kick off this discussion in more detail.
>
>
> roBman
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 13:12 -0400, Braun, Andrew wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> First off an introduction, I am Andy Braun from Sony Ericsson. I have
>> been tagged to chair this POI working group. In addition to this
>> group, my responsibilities in Sony Ericsson include researching
>> emerging web and application technologies for the office of the CTO.
>>
>> I hope those of you who are Advisory Committee representatives have
>> already seen that a Points of Interest WG charter [1] has been
>> submitted for review. The charter details three main deliverables: a
>> "Points of Interest" Recommendation, a WG Note detailing AR specific
>> POI properties, and another note that covers how AR and Web standards
>> can converge. †There are other potentially separate deliverables, such
>> as best practices, use cases/requirements, a 'landscape' document,
>> test suite, etc.
>>
>>
>>
>> The review period ends on the 24th of September, so please be sure
>> that you or your AC rep fill in the survey [2] as soon as possible.
>> †If you haven't joined W3C yet, now is the time. †Once the review
>> ends, there is a two week period where W3C management reviews the
>> results and creates the new WG. †So, the WG should be ready to go the
>> week of 11 October. †While we could have our first teleconference
>> during the week of 11 October, many of the groupís participants will
>> likely be at ISMAR that week. So I recommend we have our call during
>> the week of 18 October. †Before then, I'll send out a poll for
>> selecting the time and date. I'll follow up with an agenda about a
>> week or so before the meeting.
>>
>> With regards to the first face to face meeting, we did talk about
>> meeting at TPAC in Lyon during November. However, for a number of
>> reasons which I am happy to discuss, this will not be possible. I
>> would like to meet face to face this year. With holidays approaching I
>> believe the best chance would be during the first week or second week
>> of December. †I will provide more details about the site and logistics
>> in a future note.
>>
>>
>>
>> I look forward to a continued interesting and fruitful discussion.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Andy Braun
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/charter/
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/POI-2010/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 10 September 2010 00:11:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 10 September 2010 00:11:36 GMT