Re: Group decision to move Pointer Events 2 to proposed recommendation (please respond within one week)

Sorry for the delay. I just sent a pull request to address that outstanding
issue and a small editorial issue.

Regarding the PR, I believe we are all good on Google side.

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 5:27 AM Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
wrote:

> Ping...
>
> On 22/09/2018 14:30, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
> > Not having heard any objection, I'll assume that the group is happy
> > moving forward with PR ? A positive response here, rather than silence,
> > would be great, but not mandatory...
> >
> > Also, we still have https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/259
> > outstanding. I've not had a chance to deep-dive into what's really
> > needed here. Navid, Olli, anybody able to at least make an initial stab
> > at this?
> >
> > Also, in related news, you've probably heard that WebKit are now
> > apparently starting development of PE as well...
> > https://twitter.com/grorgwork/status/1043302741626376192 (better late
> > than never?)
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > On 11/09/2018 11:45, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> I'm fairly certain we've had informal agreement for ages that the
> >> group is ok to move forward with going to proposed recommendation, but
> >> I can't seem to find (in minutes or email threads) an unambiguous vote
> >> or decision to that effect.
> >>
> >> Could I therefore explicitly ask, for process' sake, members of this
> >> group to please respond to this email and to indicate whether or not
> >> they're happy for us to move PE2 to proposed recommendation? Please
> >> respond, if possible, within one week of this email.
> >>
> >> Additionally, Philippe quite rightly pointed me to a handful of open
> >> issues that need to be addressed before we can proceed:
> >>
> >> * https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/256 - I see Navid is
> >> already on the case here.
> >>
> >> * https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/259 - seems like this is
> >> just a matter of rewording prose; if so, I'll get on it today.
> >>
> >> * https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/254 - I closed this, as
> >> I don't think it's a simple/straightforward editorial change to make
> >> (unless I'm missing something, this would require either manual
> >> addition of CSS classes in the spec itself, or switching to Bikeshed)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Patrick
> >
>
>
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>
>