W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pointer-events@w3.org > January to March 2017

Re: Pointer Event WPT Results

From: Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:17:34 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFUtAY9+OxQgHoaaVJXNSB3Pvpz2ZyO5xW67Du4oQth9WbXqSA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Dinklocker <Ted.Dinklocker@microsoft.com>
Cc: Navid Zolghadr <nzolghadr@chromium.org>, "Patrick H. Lauke" <plauke@paciellogroup.com>, “public-pointer-events@w3.org” <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
No worries!  As we work to wrap up Level 2, it seems we don't have too much
to discuss urgently (mostly I guess we're waiting for Gecko to finish
implementing and Edge and Blink to fix some of their outstanding bugs).

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Ted Dinklocker <
Ted.Dinklocker@microsoft.com> wrote:

> Apologies all – I meant to attend. I intended on calling in. However, by
> body clock told me it was Thursday and I successfully ignored any calendar
> notifications that I got. Next week it is!
>
>
>
> *From:* Rick Byers [mailto:rbyers@chromium.org]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 15, 2017 10:42 AM
> *To:* Navid Zolghadr <nzolghadr@chromium.org>; Patrick H. Lauke <
> plauke@paciellogroup.com>
> *Cc:* “public-pointer-events@w3.org” <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Pointer Event WPT Results
>
>
>
> So I guess there was no meeting today (though we used the time to have a
> nice Google-only discussion of a predicted points API
> <https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/38> <grin>).
>
>
>
> Patrick, want to include Navid's suggestions on an agenda for next week?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> This is great Navid, thank you!  This "less than 2" list is small enough
> that I'm sure we can drive it down to zero before too long.
>
>
>
> In particular, if nobody else has plans to implement
> pan-left/right/up/down and tangentialPressure/twist in the next few months
> then we can move those to the extensions spec.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Navid Zolghadr <nzolghadr@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I just updated the pointer event test results
> <http://w3c.github.io/test-results/pointerevents/all.html> with the
> latest Chrome and what I got from Ted for Edge and from Stone for FireFox.
> Here <http://w3c.github.io/test-results/pointerevents/less-than-2.html>
> is the list of those that have less that 2 passing implementations.
>
>
>
> Maybe we can talk about the failures and a plan to drive them down in
> tomorrow's meeting.
>
> Also that would be great if we can discuss about the two remaining
> blocking issues against the spec:
>
>    - What is the relationship between SetPointerCapture, PointerLock, and
>    browser default behaviors?
>    <https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/135>
>    <https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/135>
>    - Specify that "click", "dblclick" and "contextmenu" events are
>    PointerEvents <https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/100>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Navid
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2017 21:18:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 15 February 2017 21:18:33 UTC