Re: Pointer Events implementation hackathon - week of July 25th in Redmond

Note that hotels appear to be pretty booked up that week (must be something
going on) so options are limited.  I've booked at Silver Cloud downtown
Bellevue <http://www.silvercloud.com/bellevuedowntown/> (and I think the
other Google folks are going to as well).

Rick

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Ted Dinklocker <
Ted.Dinklocker@microsoft.com> wrote:

> I am also looking forward to it.
>
>
>
> I created a doodle poll to gather RSVP’s -
> http://doodle.com/poll/9grpa8cew2r7mqwi
>
>
>
> Please hit the doodle poll to RSVP so that I can plan for lunches and
> plenty of space.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Ted
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Rick Byers [mailto:rbyers@chromium.org]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 16, 2016 7:31 AM
> *To:* public-pointer-events@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: Pointer Events implementation hackathon - week of July
> 25th in Redmond
>
>
>
> Note that Tuesday July 26th and Wednesday July 27th are now confirmed for
> this event and folks should feel free to book travel.  I'm really looking
> forward to it!
>
>
>
> Rick
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> In preparation for shipping Pointer Events in Chrome, we'd like to do an
> implementation hackathon F2F this summer with the primary goal of
> identifying and understanding outstanding differences in implementation
> behavior and their impact on web compatibility in practice.
>
>
>
> The plan is for engineers working on implementations of pointer events
> (browsers or polyfills) to spend a couple days at Microsoft headquarters in
> Redmond, probably July 26th to July 27th or 28th. Details and a rough
> proposed agenda are in this document
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1b8aJOJcGXakstFJslKl87QwvlFHhHwGbQfJwnUTBBHg/edit>.
> Feel free to suggest other agenda items.
>
>
>
> Obviously any spec issues will be taken to the WG as normal (discussed on
> GitHub or F2F at TPAC in September).  So this isn't a formal W3C F2F
> meeting, really just a gathering of implementors.  Anyone else interested?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>    Rick
>
>
>
>
>