- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:15:41 -0400
- To: "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
# Pre meeting ...
/invite trackbot
trackbot, associate this channel with #pointerevents
/invite Zakim
Zakim, this will be RWC_PEWG
#Teleconf res:
<https://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_5573>
/invite RRSAgent
RRSAgent, make log public
# Minutes
* To add URL + text for the link: *URL****-> World Wide Web Consortium *
ScribeNick: ArtB
Scribe: ArtB
Meeting: Pointer Events WG Voice Conference
Agenda:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2014JulSep/0130.html
Chair: ArtB
Present: Art_Barstow, Doug_Schepers,
# Mozilla: Matt_Brubeck, Olli_Pettay,
# Nokia: Art_Barstow, Cathy_Chan
# Opera: Sangwhan_Moon
# jQuery: Scott_González
# Google: Rick_Byers, Peter_Beverloo, Alex_Russell
# Microsoft: Jacob_Rossi, Asir_Vedamuthu ("ah-sir")
# Patrick_Lauke
Regrets: Olli_Pettay
*Topic: Tweak and agree on agenda *
AB: I posted a draft agenda yesterday
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2014JulSep/0130.html>.
AB: Since then, Bug-26888 (Add "pointerleave" to "9.1 The touch-action
CSS property") was submitted so I propose we add that bug to the agenda
<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26888>.
AB: any objections to that addition?
[ None ]
AB: we also now have PR-1249 (PointerEvents Test Assertions 15.11,
15.18-15.20) so I propose we discuss that during our Pull Request topic
and drop the related item from agenda topic #4.
AB: any objections to that change?
[ None ]
AB: any other agenda change requests?
2. Open PRs: plans and status
*Topic: PR-1121; SVG touch-action tests*
AB: PR-1121 <https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/1121> was
blocked on Doug's Action-116
https://www.w3.org/2012/pointerevents/track/actions/116
AB: Doug replied today and completed his action.
AB: having seen no objections to the PR itself, I propose someone merge
this PR. Any objections to that?
ACTION: Jacob merge PR-1121
*Topic: PR-1220; Assertions 4.3 and 5.3*
AB: PR-1220 <https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/1220>. Is
this blocked on a review by someone other than Microsoft?
AB: there is also Action-122 "Follow up with Artem re pr-1220" on Jacob
; <https://www.w3.org/2012/pointerevents/track/actions/122> . Jacob - it
appears this can now be closed, is that correct?
ACTION: @TBD review PR-1220 and merge if it is OK
ACTION: Jacob close Action-122
*Topic: PR-1245; Properly check for async events related to capture*
AB: PR-1245 <https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/1245>; it
appears this PR addresses Action-126
<https://www.w3.org/2012/pointerevents/track/actions/126>. Need someone
to review this PR. Volunteer, please?
ACTION: @TBD review PR-1245
*Topic: PR-1249**; **PointerEvents Test Assertions 15.11, 15.18-15.20*
AB: yesterday Jacob submitted PR-1249 and it adds tests for assertions
15.{11,18-20} <https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/1249>. We
need someone to review this PR and merge it if it is OK. Would someone
please volunteer review this PR?
ACTION: @TBD review PR-1249
3. Open Actions
*Topic: Open Actions*
AB: Action-119; Review the test for 15.20 when it is available and let
us know if it covers the high priority manipulation scenarios; Cathy;
<https://www.w3.org/2012/pointerevents/track/actions/119> ; now that we
have PR-1249, Cathy please review this.
AB: Action-124; Create tests for assertions 11.3 and 13.4 ; Scott ;
<https://www.w3.org/2012/pointerevents/track/actions/124>
AB: Scott - what is the ETA for these tests?
*Topic: Bug 26809; IE11 on Win8.1 fires a click event after pointer has
moved when element has touch-event: none*
AB: Bug-26809 <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26809> has
had some comments including Patrick's followup on the list on Sept 15
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2014JulSep/0125.html>
AB: kinda feels like we might just need to make a few non-normative
tweaks to the spec
ACTION:
RESOLUTION:
*Topic: Bug 26888 (Add "pointerleave" to "9.1 The touch-action CSS
property") *
AB: Jacob created this bug yesterday
<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26888>. The bug includes
an explicit change proposal. Any comments?
AB: seems to be related to discussion around Bug-26809
ACTION:
RESOLUTION:
*Topic: Amazing set/releasePointerCapture*
AB: Maksim Lebedev submitted this e-mail on Sept 12;
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2014JulSep/0118.html>
and there has been no followup.
ACTION: @ reply to "Amazing set/releasePointerCapture" thread
*Topic: Plan to move Pointer Events back to LC and then Proposed
Recommendation *
AB: as previously agreed, our Plan of Record (PoR) is essentially to
first: fix all spec bugs; complete the test suite; run interop testing;
update specs and or implementations accordingly. Second, when we have
two or more independent implementations that pass all test cases:
publish a LCWD and assuming there are no substantive comments during the
3-week LC comment period, we propose to the Director publishing a
Proposed Recommendation (and thus not publish an explicit Candidate
Recommendation).
AB: although we have had a number of developments since we agreed to
this PoR, I don't believe there have been any substantive "new
info/data" to change that plan.
AB: any comments on this, and/or agreement with the above PoR?
AB: one additional task I think we should add is to do a short-ish
(f.ex. 1-2 week) "pre LC Request for Comments" and target specific
people and/or groups such as Anne van Kesteren, public-script-coord,
www-dom, TAG.
*Topic: **AoB *
AB: as is SOP for this group, if it appears a call would be helpful next
week, I'll send a draft agenda at least a day in advance; otherwise
there will be no call and I'll make such an announcement.
AB: anything else for today?
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2014 16:16:22 UTC