Re: "List of Pointer Events" table default actions

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>wrote:

> On 21/01/2014 16:38, Rick Byers wrote:
>
>> Thanks Patrick!  Normally we just discuss potential changes over e-mail
>> (although in the past the changes have been simple enough that it's easy
>> to just include the proposed text in e-mail, possibly not the case
>> here).  There is a bug tracker -
>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/describecomponents.cgi?
>> product=PointerEventsWG.
>>   You could file a new bug and put details there if you like.
>>
>
> As you probably see, done https://www.w3.org/Bugs/
> Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24346


Great, I'll take discussion to the bug (one minor edit but otherwise looks
great to me).


>  Since the compatibility mouse events stuff is listed as optional, I
>> think it would be better to avoid complicating 5.2.1 much for them and
>> instead leave the discussion to section 11.  Your "If the pointer is
>> primary ..." note sounds good to me.
>>
>
> Yup, agree. Made those changes (see code fragment attached to bug) as well
> as a few more (see description).
>
>
>  I don't really have a strong preference on the ordering - I do like that
>> your proposed ordering focuses on the order events are typically seen in
>> practice instead of the logical grouping.
>>
>
> Personally, I think this order (in which they're generally fired) is more
> intuitive for a developer, and it will tie in with non-normative
> illustration/flow of how events are fired, once i get to that part).
>
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
> ______________________________________________________________
> re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
> [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
> http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
> ______________________________________________________________
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
> ______________________________________________________________
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2014 00:01:11 UTC