W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pointer-events@w3.org > October to December 2013

RE: Status of review for PR-324

From: Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:32:22 +0000
To: Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com>, Scott González <scott.gonzalez@gmail.com>
CC: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7e1da1beda1c4d08984927dbf25ce017@BN1PR03MB267.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Yes, thanks Scott. That's awesome.

From: Rick Byers [mailto:rbyers@google.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 12:07 PM
To: Scott González
Cc: Arthur Barstow; public-pointer-events@w3.org
Subject: Re: Status of review for PR-324

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Scott González <scott.gonzalez@gmail.com<mailto:scott.gonzalez@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com<mailto:rbyers@google.com>> wrote:
I think the test files should have coarser granularity.

This was one of my biggest concerns as well. I was going to wait for the updates to land and then try to do a pass at reducing the number of files. There are places where there can be easy gains, such as merging the files named *_(mouse|pen|touch) and just having a flag for which set of tests to run. Many of the other tests can also be combined.

That would be great Scott, thank you!
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2013 19:33:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:20:25 UTC