- From: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 08:15:13 +0200
- To: W3C POE WG <public-poe-wg@w3.org>
Hi! For me - reading the scribed discussion + resolution of POE.R.V.08 [1,2] - it's unclear whether requirement POE.R.V.08 was finally rejected or "conditionally" accepted: ------------------------------ phila: no explicit mention to laws can be made, this is a matter of profiles. renato: perhaps re-utilize is secondaryUse sabrina: secondaryUse is also interesting for the GDPR (data protection) benws: this is a matter for a profile, even if tiny RESOLUTION: database law terms are rejected ... POE.R.V.08 accepted ------------------------------ br, simon [1] https://www.w3.org/2016/09/22-poe-minutes.html#item16 [2] https://www.w3.org/2016/09/22-poe-minutes.html#resolution10 -- DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2016 06:15:39 UTC