- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:01:44 -0000
- To: "Denis Ah-Kang" <denis@w3.org>
- Cc: "Phil Archer" <phila@w3.org>, "Webmaster" <webreq@w3.org>, "W3C POE WG" <public-poe-wg@w3.org>, "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>, "Maria Auday" <maria@w3.org>, "w3t-comm@w3.org Team" <w3t-comm@w3.org>
Soec group: I looked and couldn't see one that matched. Suggest 'Licensing' as possible. Maria has hp news text. Abstracts are short but maybe @Renato can help if more needed. Sorry to be brief. See auto responder... > Hi Phil, > > To summarize, there are 2 FPWD and 1 Note: > - http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-odrl-model-20160721/ > - http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-odrl-20160721/ > - http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-poe-ucr-20160721/ > > There was a mistake on the PP link for the first document that I > fixed [1]. > Can you please provide a short description of each document and the > specification groups they belong to? I will then need Ralph's approval > and we'll be ready for tomorrow's publications. > > Denis > > [1] > https://cvs.w3.org/Team/WWW/TR/2016/WD-odrl-model-20160721/Overview.html > > On 07/19/2016 10:21 PM, Phil Archer wrote: >> Hi Denis, >> >> This is a publication request for 3 FPWDs, subject to Ralph's approval >> of [1]. That e-mail contains all you need - all the docs are in place >> and ready for publication on Thursday. >> >> I'm going to update the files in /ns/odrl/2 as well and will check that >> nothing breaks as a result (it really shouldn't but I'll check). As >> ever, the link checker's lack of understanding of RDF causes it to >> report broken frag IDs that aren't broken. >> >> @Maria - here's some suggested text for the HP news: >> >> <p>The Permissions & Obligations Expression (<a >> href="/2016/poe/">POE</a>) Working Group has published the First Public >> Working Drafts for the <a href="/TR/2016/WD-odrl-model-20160721/">ODRL >> Information Model</a> and the <a >> href="/TR/2016/WD-vocab-odrl-20160721/">ODRL Vocabulary & >> Expression</a>. These FPWDs provide a flexible and interoperable >> information model, vocabulary, and encoding mechanisms for describing >> statements about digital content usage. The deliverables are based on >> the previous reports created by the W3C <a href="/community/odrl/">ODRL >> Community Group</a> and form the baseline for future enhancements by the >> POE WG. In addition, the POE WG has published the FPWD of the <a >> href="/TR/2016/NOTE-poe-ucr-20160721/">Use Case and Requirements >> Note</a>. These Use Cases will be reviewed and analyzed further into >> detailed requirements. The POE WG is calling for wider community >> feedback and contributions to the set of Use Cases to further enhance >> and improve the ODRL permissions and obligations expression >> language.</p> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Phil >> >> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2016JulSep/0021.html >> >> > -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse typos.
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2016 14:01:56 UTC