- From: Renato Iannella <renato.iannella@monegraph.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:25:48 +1000
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: "Michael Steidl (IPTC)" <mdirector@iptc.org>, Mo McRoberts <Mo.McRoberts@bbc.co.uk>, Stuart Myles <SMyles@ap.org>, James Birmingham <james.birmingham@cde.catapult.org.uk>, Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>, W3C POE WG <public-poe-wg@w3.org>
> On 19 Jul 2016, at 01:15, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > > As discussed in the meeting, I've changed odrl-vocab to vocab-odrl. Then I ran the document through the link checker, see https://validator.w3.org/checklink Phil, I notice that other recent specs follow the “name-type” model, such as: https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/ https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-protocol/ https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-core/ https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocab/ https://www.w3.org/TR/presentation-api/ It seems to make more sense to put the “parent” name first? I am working on the other issues now… It seems a last minute change to the auto-script has messed up the definition/comment sections… I will try and turn the dual-tables into one... Renato Iannella, Monegraph Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2016 01:26:24 UTC