Re: [poe] Assigner/Assignee at the policy level

Option 2 is the more powerful, but it complicates the validator (the processing will be easy, though).
In any case, there is something wrong/imprecise in the spec (2.1.2) now:

> [Offer Class] must have one assigner property value (of type Party) to indicate the functional role in the same Rules.

I would write it as:
> [Offer Class] must have one assigner property value (of type Party) to indicate the functional role in the same Rules.

> [Offer Class] must have **either** one assigner property value (of type Party) to indicate the functional role in the Rules, or have the assigner in each of their Rules.

Wouldn't it suffice this change? (the same applies in more points of the spec)

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by vroddon
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/239#issuecomment-326748645 using your GitHub account

Received on Saturday, 2 September 2017 14:49:53 UTC