Re: [poe] Vocab feedback

1 -> OK
2 -> OK
3 -> OK
4 -> I'll wait then.
5 -> perfect!
6 -> this would be fine but I see #101 is still open to discussion so am going to wait for that.

7 -> almost perfect. I would complain that the URI has not been changed to be a bit more precise, but you've heard me about this issue before, I'll stop here on this one ;-) and be happy with the fact that the documentation is now much, much clearer.
Also I hope that the definition "The Assigner transfers/does not transfer the ownership" will be clarified as part of item 4.

8 -> ok, using 'convert' instead of 'make a copy' does clarify a lot.

9 -> actually this would be fixed by your answer for the first item of #164, so I think I'm good.

10 -> perfect!

11 -> I'm not sure talking about a 'transformed asset' is right in the context of translation. Anyway, it's much better now!

12 -> Yes this is what I meant. Note that the Web Annotation WG had discussions about aligning to Media Ontology fragments. They ended up with their own solution (but MA fragments are also valid for WA if I remember well), it may be useful for you to dig up their rationale. And then decide if you need to create your own solution (but then it would be the third available, probably that's too much!).

13 -> OK

Conclusion: out of the original comments/issues here, only 6 and 12 remain to be assessed.


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/185#issuecomment-304643779 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 29 May 2017 11:56:31 UTC