Re: [poe] Model clarifications

We have made a major update to the IM that addresses many of these comments now.

See this commit e055b79b52922eb52942a7622cebe25df3c091f1

1 - covered in commit

2 - removed all the "refers"

3/4 - covered in commit

5 - The ODRL conflict strategy only deals with perms/prohit conflicts. We have issue #138 discussing this now.

6 - Added more details.

7 - Updated the two scope sections. One reason for this feature is that there may not be the ability to identify the scoped-group with a URI.

8/9 - covered in commit

10 - Done

11 - Updated the text. That example is a not rightOperandReference, it is that actual URI that is compared to the leftOperand. That is, you do not deref the "IT" uri to get the value.
 
12 - Updated the use case examples

New commits 3a11111d80d6db29d13a10e88d99aff6346ca1cf


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by riannella
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/162#issuecomment-299361282 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 5 May 2017 03:18:52 UTC