- From: Renato Iannella via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 02:11:34 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
riannella has just labeled an issue for https://github.com/w3c/poe as "To Be Closed": == Does every permission/prohibition need to have both an assignee & assigner? == ISSUE-11: Does every permission/prohibition need to have both an assignee & assigner? parties of perm/proh Does every permission/prohibition need to have both an assignee & assigner? State: RAISED Product: POE - Information Model Raised by: Simon Steyskal Opened on: 2016-11-08 Description: The current spec states (comments inline; similar for prohibition): > 3.4 Permission > > The Permission entity indicates the Actions that the assignee is permitted to perform on the associated Asset. It is not required for perm/proh to have any party assigned. > In other words, what the assigner (supplier) has granted to the assignee (consumer). I would argue that not every assigner/assignee has the role of a supplier/consumer. > [...] > Party: the Permission MUST refer to one or more Party entities linked via the Role entity (see Section 2.3.1) (OPTIONAL) Is it possible to combine MUST and OPTIONAL? See https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/113
Received on Friday, 24 March 2017 02:11:41 UTC