- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 07:24:51 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
I would hope the WG is ok with the current approach for selectors! I was suggesting to look at re-using exisitng patterns because it's a good practice (see BP15 at https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#dataVocabularies). But I also understand if the WG judges it has more pressing issues to solve. I have to reckon I've seen worse cases of lack of ontology duplication, after all. On 19/06/17 05:49, Renato Iannella wrote: > The WG seems ok with the current approach. @philarcher1 <https://github.com/philarcher1> raised the correct use of URIs (a few weeks ago too). > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/185#issuecomment-309332119>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAnpraaMbXi0X6ZgQNgdJo8ADqBluLcVks5sFe-4gaJpZM4NgAZZ>. > -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/185#issuecomment-309359739 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 19 June 2017 07:24:57 UTC