Re: [poe] Model clarifications

There’s still the issue about URI hijacking, but I’m going to continue this in #164 instead as it seems to be where it’s happening.

Definition of rightOperand and rightOperandReference is better, both in the Voc and the IM. Well done.

I think I'm ok with the current use of data types, but their definition (https://w3c.github.io/poe/vocab/#term-dataType) is still strange (“In RDF encodings, use of the rdf:datatype MUST be used. In JSON-LD encoding, the use of @type MUST be used.”). In addition, what’s the use of still minting odrl:dataType if it’s not going to be used in actual encodings? Note that you could keep this section in the POE vocabulary doc could exist without creating a new property.

Re. the issue of duty-related conflicts, I believe that the course of the discussion between @riannella and @simonstey (as well as the changes already made in the IM) should answer my original question. I am not going to interfere any further here!


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/162#issuecomment-309290818 using your GitHub account

Received on Sunday, 18 June 2017 17:25:04 UTC