[poe] Issue: consistency of definitions marked as To Be Closed

riannella has just labeled an issue for https://github.com/w3c/poe as "To Be Closed":

== consistency of definitions ==
http://w3c.github.io/poe/model/#rule

> The Rule class has the following properties:
> - A Rule MUST have a target Asset. Other relation values for Asset MAY be used.
> - A Rule MUST have an Action via the action property.
> - A Rule MAY have one or more assigner and/or assignee function roles undertaken by Party entities Other function properties for Party MAY be used.

why are those 3 conditions phrased differently? 

- A Rule MUST have an Asset via the target property. 
- A Rule MUST have an Action via the action property.
- A Rule MAY have one or more Parties via the assigner/assignee property.
---------------
- A Rule MUST have a target Asset.
- A Rule MUST have an Action
- A Rule MAY have one or more Assigners and/or Assignees
---------------
- A Rule MUST have one or more asset relations undertaken by Asset entities. Other relation values for Asset MAY be used.
- A Rule MUST have one or more action properties relating to Action entities via the action property.
- A Rule MAY have one or more assigner and/or assignee function roles undertaken by Party entities. Other function properties for Party MAY be used. 

See https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/171

Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2017 06:37:36 UTC