Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses

> Also, I think that @simonstey wants to use odrl:and as the property

yes, [like in SHACL](https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/#AndConstraintComponent)

> ... and what happens to odrl:andSequence? 

didn't we agree to have it as one of the operators of "normal" constraints?

> to set its Range to Constraint

the range of what? 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by simonstey
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/206#issuecomment-314068068 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 10 July 2017 10:30:18 UTC