- From: Michael Steidl via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 09:02:45 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
re 2: yes, IPTC has on its agenda to review the Common Vocab terms for adoption by RightsML. But I think the union of the two sets "core ODRL-defined properties" and "properties defined by the profile applied to this Policy" has less elements than the union of the three sets "core ODRL-defined properties", "properties defined by the profile applied to this Policy" and "ODRL Common Vocabulary-defined properties". And actually only the first union should be valid for an ODRL Policy. -- GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/202#issuecomment-313628266 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 7 July 2017 09:02:50 UTC