Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses

I question the "sequential **logical** operator" in the **Binary** Constraint - just to support the **logical** andSequence

All logical constraints should be in the "Multi Constraint".

Perhaps we should then support rdf:Seq for this purpose:

o:constraint [
  o:and [
    a rdf:Seq;
        rdf:_1 C1;
        rdf:_2 C2.
    ].

And we then don't even need o:andSequence any more ?




-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by riannella
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/206#issuecomment-312762406 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 4 July 2017 01:59:27 UTC