Re: [poe] Improve Constraint definitions

Re taking "Asset" of identifiers: I don't have a fundamental objection
 to that - but a concern: at IPTC we have regular discussions about 
the fact that many users of (IPTC) standards only look into formal 
validation documents (XML Schemas, JSON Schemas ...) and even 
expecting that they will read the attached documentation is reaching 
too far in many cases. Therefore we try to have "telling identifiers" 
- identifiers which reflect the semantics of the property. 
absoluteSpatialAssetPosition makes quite clear what is covered by the 
constraint, absoluteSpatialPosition opens the implemention to personal
 assumptions of the implementer.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/67#issuecomment-274801913 using your
 GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2017 13:26:47 UTC