Re: [poe] Dc:license vocabulary hijacking?

> odrl:hasPolicy certainly has broader semantics than dct:license. The policy might, for example, express a regulation.
> I sincerely doubt that any implementation depends on the axiom in question. I would be tempted to follow the suggestion of @nitmws <https://github.com/nitmws> : create a new ODRL property odrl:hasLicense with odrl:hasLicense rdfs:subPropertyOf odrl:hasPolicy .
> 

I am not sure what "broader semantics" mean in this context. Are we sure that odrl:hasPolicy being a _subproperty_ of dct:license does not cover that?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by iherman
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/286#issuecomment-353045914 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2017 12:03:53 UTC