- From: Michael Steidl via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 06:58:05 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
The inserted "... value" looks ok. The "type of ..." wording is a good approach to underline what in the ODRL ontology is the Range. Having a look at the 17 August IM version I noticed: * not all properties have a "type of" yet. Example: `conflict `in the Policy Class --> type of ConflictTerm. * the term of the type should be a singular. Example Set Class: "... value of type Rules" --> "... value of type Rule" -- GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/218#issuecomment-322985669 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 17 August 2017 06:58:06 UTC