W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pkg-uri-scheme@w3.org > March 2009

Re: ACTION-315: Widget URI scheme thoughts

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:45:39 +0100
Message-ID: <b21a10670903160745i2806ce1obff86b234d8a3f7d@mail.gmail.com>
To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
Cc: Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, public-pkg-uri-scheme@w3.org
Correction...

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com> wrote:
> Hi Larry,
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org> wrote:
>> other choices:
>>
>> *    use thismessage:  from MHTML
>> *    fix   file:
>>      (packages only work for http: and local
>>      file system, not ftp:, but not a big
>>       restriction in practice).
>
>
> packages and configuration documents should be kept URI neutral (so
> one can use them over HTTP as various projects are already doing).
> However, we still want to specify a URI scheme for widget that run
> locally so engines to fall back to file://

Sorry, I meant so engines _DON'T_ fall back to file://

-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Monday, 16 March 2009 14:46:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:38:11 UTC