W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pkg-uri-scheme@w3.org > January 2009

RE: tag: uri scheme

From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:05:35 -0800
To: "'Bjoern Hoehrmann'" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: <public-pkg-uri-scheme@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000301c97c4f$10a0bd00$31e23700$@org>

>  https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13986 

Astounding. Thanks for that pointer, hadn't seen that history.

Still, communication of a package is different than communication
of individual components, because there's an explicit processing
step which is "create the package". Even if there might be
some reasons why Apache hasn't fixed their configuration files,
is there any reason to believe that "create a package" software
couldn't be configured to always use well-known file extensions
or (if allowed) well-known content-types?

I'll still claim that the closer you are to the origin of the
data, the more likely you are going to be able to guess the
context of the data.

Larry
--
http://larry.masinter.net
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2009 05:06:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 22 January 2009 05:06:16 GMT