W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pkg-uri-scheme@w3.org > January 2009

Re: tag: uri scheme

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:03:47 -0500
Message-ID: <4977E213.5030706@mit.edu>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
CC: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>, "public-pkg-uri-scheme@w3.org" <public-pkg-uri-scheme@w3.org>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, Tim Kindberg <timothy@hpl.hp.com>

Larry Masinter wrote:
> Yes, using Zip is a different overall serialization than 
> MIME multipart, but aren't the problem spaces similar enough
> that differences from what is already widespread practice?

MIME multipart would have the side benefit of specifying MIME types.  At 
the same time, authoring might be a little more complicated...

-Boris
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2009 03:05:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 22 January 2009 03:05:06 GMT