Re: aria-level a required property for role="heading" or a supported property with an RFC SHOULD for authors

>We would like list feedback as to whether this should required or rather
have an RFC 2119 SHOULD for its use as a supported property in role
"heading".

+1 to aria-level being a required property, not requiring does not lead to
a better outcome as it  allows the use of  headings without levels removing
all notion of heading heirarchy.

--

Regards

SteveF
Current Standards Work @W3C
<http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/>

On 18 June 2015 at 18:26, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> The ARIA task force had issue that pertained to making aria-level a
> required property vs. a supported property for role="heading".
>
> We would like list feedback as to whether this should required or rather
> have an RFC 2119 SHOULD for its use as a supported property in role
> "heading".
>
> Please see the minutes of the discussion: *http://www.w3.org/2015/06/18-aria-minutes.html
> <http://www.w3.org/2015/06/18-aria-minutes.html>*
>
>
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
>