Re: ARIA 1.1 issue with role=region spec text and implied usage

if it is not important enough to be in a page summary, why would it be in 
a region?
Example of page summary: jaws region tree.
BTW, I usually put breadcrumbs in nav elements.

Matt King
IBM Senior Technical Staff Member
I/T Chief Accessibility Strategist
IBM BT/CIO - Global Workforce and Web Process Enablement 
Phone: (503) 578-2329, Tie line: 731-7398
mattking@us.ibm.com



From:   Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@ssbbartgroup.com>
To:     W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>, 
Date:   04/23/2015 11:50 AM
Subject:        ARIA 1.1 issue with role=region spec text and implied 
usage



This came up yesterday, and it's something I wished to raise regarding the 
spec definition for the region role at
http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-1.1/#region
Which states:

"A large perceivable section of a web page or document, that is important 
enough to be included in a page summary or table of contents, for example, 
an area of the page containing live sporting event statistics."

In practice however, there are many valid uses for named regions that 
don't fit this definition, such as the following:

<div role="region" aria-label="breadcrumbs">
... breadcrumb structure ...
</div>

Amongst many others, none of which fit into the 'large structure that ties 
into the table of contents' definition mentioned in the spec, which is 
confusing developers who simply want to define a specific region on the 
page for a specific navigable purpose.

The helpful aspect of the above usage, is that it puts visually oriented 
regions into the region list for ATs, making it easy to find and navigate 
to specific regions of interest. However the spec text actively 
discourages this.

Can this be modified to be less restrictive?